- Active, not recruiting
NCT02891811: Phase 2: Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Comparing KTd vs. KRd Induction
Updated: Jun 8, 2022
NCT02891811: Phase 2: Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Comparing KTd vs. KRd Induction Therapy and Investigating a K-mono Maintenance Strategy
Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Comparing KTd vs. KRd Induction Therapy and Investigating a K-mono Maintenance Strategy
This is a randomized, 2-arm phase II, multi-center study to evaluate the overall response rate in newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible patients receiving 9 cycles induction therapy with either KTd or KRd followed by randomization to either carfilzomib maintenance treatment for 12 months or to observation only. Maintenance is given for 12 cycles or progression of disease, whatever occurs first.
Sponsor
Arbeitsgemeinschaft medikamentoese Tumortherapie
Collaborator
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02891811
Official Title: A Randomized Phase II, 2-armed Study in Transplant Ineligible (TI) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Comparing Carfilzomib + Thalidomide + Dexamethasone (KTd) Versus Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (KRd) Induction Therapy With Respect to Response Rates and Investigating a Carfilzomib (K) Monotherapy Maintenance Strategy
First Posted: September 8, 2016
Click here for details on ClinicalTrials.gov
Drug: Carfilzomib
Drug: Thalidomide
Drug: Lenalidomide
Drug: Dexamethasone
EHA 2022 Oral Presentation
EHA 2022 - HYBRID - JUNE 9-17 - VIENNA
RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN KRD AND KTD INDUCTION, FOLLOWED BY K MAINTENANCE OR OBSERVATION IN TRANSPLANT NON-ELIGIBLE PATIENTS WITH NDMM (AGMT-MM02 TRIAL)
Location
Austria
Germany